[Discussion on cuffed or uncuffed tubes is superfluous.
Further remarks on the paper by T. Erb and F. J. Frei Anaesthesist
(2001) 50:395-400.]
[Article in German]
Schultz-Coulon HJ
Publication Types:
Letter
PMID: 12063726, UI: 22059552
Anaesthesist 2002 Apr;51(4):321-3
[Tubes with cuffs in newborn and young children are a
risk! Remarks on the paper by T. Erb and F. J. Frei (Anaesthesist
(2001) 50:395-400.]
[Article in German]
Holzki J
Publication Types:
Letter
PMID: 12063725, UI: 22059551
Anaesthesist 2002 Apr;51(4):320
[Greater caution using tubes with cuffs. Remarks on the
paper "The use of cuffed endotracheal tubes in infants
and small children" by T. Erb and F. J. Frei (Anaesthesist
(2001) 50:395-400.]
[Article in German]
Hoeve LJ
Publication Types:
Letter
PMID: 12063724, UI: 22059550
Anaesthesist 2002 Apr;51(4):285-91
[The effect of anesthetics on control of respiration.]
[Article in German]
Sarton E, Romberg R, Nieuwenhuijs D, Teppema LJ, Vuyk
J, Schraag S, Dahan A
Ventilatory control in humans depends on complex mechanisms
which aim to maintain a cellular CO2-, O2- and H(+)-homeostasis
under physiological conditions. This regulation is based
on chemical control which predominantly acts via peripheral
chemoreceptors in the carotid bodies and central chemoreceptors
in the ventral medulla of the brainstem on the one hand,
and behavioural control on the other, by which it is possible
to adapt respiration to conditions of daily living. The
influence of anaesthesia and related conditions may depress
respiration and have a sustained effect on ventilatory control.
Perioperative respiratory depression remains a serious clinical
problem in perioperative medicine. This review will give
an overview of ventilatory control and discuss the most
relevant responses, describe the effects of pain, anaesthetics
and opioids on ventilatory control and their interaction.
The current body of knowledge is put into perspective to
identify patients at risk for perioperative respiratory
depression.
Publication Types:
Review
Review, tutorial
PMID: 12063719, UI: 22059545
Anaesthesist 2002 Apr;51(4):239-47
[Man at risk. Preventive strategies and risk management
for patient safety.]
Anaesthesia-related risk has been significantly reduced
within the last decade. Nevertheless the risk and the possibility
of dying or suffering permanent damage still exist. To improve
patient safety, risk assessment and analysis must lead to
the development of preventive strategies. For this purpose
anaesthesia can rely on the concepts of other "high
reliability" organisations such as aviation or nuclear
power plants. Analyses of critical incidents in the different
fields confirm that next to technical problems human factors
account for most of the preventable mishaps. Human factors
are responsible for individual mistakes as well as for organisational
errors. Therefore besides traditional concepts of risk reduction
(e.g. guidelines) new strategies (e.g. full-scale simulation)
must be applied to minimise the negative impact of human
factors on patient safety. Risk management has to consider
technical, organisational and human factors to implement
a higher standard of patient safety.
Publication Types:
Review
Review, tutorial
PMID: 12063713, UI: 22059539
Anaesthesist 2002 Apr;51(4):237-8
[Risk management in anesthesiology--a continuing challenge.]
[Article in German]
Martin E
Publication Types:
Editorial
PMID: 12063712, UI: 22059538
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2002 May;21 Suppl 1:7s-23s
Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Abbreviated
text.
[Medline record in process]
PMID: 12091990, UI: 22087349
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002 May;19(5):350-6
Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl
on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental
or etomidate.
Wilhelm W, Biedler A, Huppert A, Kreuer S, Bucheler O,
Ziegenfuss T, Larsen R
University of Saarland, Department of Anaesthesiology and
Intensive Care Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany. wolfram.wilhelm@t-online.de
[Medline record in process]
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized,
double-blinded study was designed to compare the effects
of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics
of propofol, thiopental or etomidate. METHODS: Seventy-two
patients were enrolled in six groups of 12 individuals each.
In three groups, fentanyl was given as a bolus dose of 1.5
microg kg(-1), whereas the others received a remifentanil
infusion at 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Five minutes later,
propofol, thiopental or etomidate were titrated to a state
of unresponsiveness. Assessment included the amounts of
drug necessary for induction, haemodynamics and the times
to apnoea, loss of eyelash reflex, and the release of a
water-filled syringe held in the patient's hand. RESULTS:
Induction times to loss of the eyelash reflex were significantly
shorter in the remifentanil than in the fentanyl groups:
with propofol 50.7 +/- 13.6s (mean +/- SD) versus 74.9 +/-
27.0s (P < 0.01), with thiopental 42.9 +/- 16.8s versus
77.2 +/- 27.8s (P < 0.01) and with etomidate 54.7 +/-
17.6s versus 72.3 +/- 24.0s (P < 0.05). The times to
respiratory arrest or for the syringe to fall were significantly
shorter with remifentanil than with fentanyl for propofol
and for thiopental, but not for etomidate. In terms of dosages
per kg body weight necessary to achieve unresponsiveness,
less propofol (-29%, P < 0.05), thiopental (-25%, P <
0.05) or etomidate (-32%, P < 0.01) was necessary with
remifentanil than with fentanyl. Haemodynamic responses
to tracheal intubation were controlled more effectively
with remifentanil. However, within the remifentanil groups,
mean arterial pressure significantly decreased during induction:
-26% with propofol, -181% with thiopental and -14% with
etomidate (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During anaesthetic
induction, a remifentanil infusion of 0.5 microg kg(-1)
min(-1) over 5 min is a suitable alternative to a 1.5 microg
kg(-1) bolus dose of fentanyl: induction times are shorter
with reduced amounts of propofol, thiopental or etomidate.
PMID: 12095015, UI: 22089447
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002 Jun;19(6):460-2
Ventricular asystole and complete heart block after thoracic
epidural analgesia for thymectomy.
Lin TC, Hsu CH, Kong SS, Cherng CH, Wong CS
[Medline record in process]
Publication Types:
Letter
PMID: 12094924, UI: 22089356
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002 Jun;19(6):452-4
Effect of aminophylline on recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia.
Turan A, Memis D, Karamanlioglu B, Colak A, Pamukcu Z,
Turan N
Trakya University, Medical Faculty, Department of Anaesthesiology
and Reanimation, Edirne, Turkey. alpit@mynet.com
[Medline record in process]
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this randomized, double-blind
study, we aimed to investigate the effect of aminophylline
on recovery from sevoflurane. METHODS: One-hundred ASA I-II
patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided
into two groups receiving either NaCl 0.9% (Group 1, n =
50) or aminophylline 5mg kg(-1) (Group 2, n = 50). All patients
were premedicated with atropine 0.01 mgkg(-1) and midazolam
0.06mgkg(-1) intramuscularly. Anaesthesia was induced with
propofol 2mg kg(-1) for muscle relaxation, and atracurium
0.5 mg kg(-1) was maintained with sevoflurane 2% in 50%
oxygen and nitrous oxide. Further atracurium (0.1 mgkg(-1)
was given when needed. Aminophylline or saline was given
after sevoflurane was discontinued. Heart rate, mean arterial
pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, the duration of
anaesthesia and recovery times (eye opening, verbal response,
extubation and successful performance of arithmetical calculations)
were recorded. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant
differences in mean arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen
saturation and anaesthesia time between the two groups.
Heart rate increased significantly (P < 0.05) after aminophylline
and was also higher than in the placebo group. Recovery
times were significantly shorter (P < 0.001) in the patients
receiving aminophylline. CONCLUSIONS: Aminophylline speeded
recovery after sevoflurane anaesthesia and it may have some
advantage in anaesthesia practice for patients.
PMID: 12094921, UI: 22089353
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002 Jun;19(6):436-41
Psychomotor performance after short-term anaesthesia.
Haavisto E, Kauranen K
Oulu University Central Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology,
Finland.
[Medline record in process]
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the immediate
effects of short-term anaesthesia on the different components
of psychomotor performance of the upper extremity and cognitive
functions, and to find out if there were any differences
in the sensitivities of the different tests. The measured
psychomotor aspects were simple reaction time, choice reaction
time, speed of movement, index finger-tapping speed, co-ordination,
visual spatial memory capacity, digit-symbol substitution
and the Maddox Wing test. METHODS: The subjects were 30
female patients aged 24-50 yr who had been through a minor
gynaecological operation. Anaesthesia had been induced with
propofol and alfentanil. The measurements were mainly made
with the HPM/BEP system, and the tests were performed 1
h before the anaesthesia and immediately after the wake-up.
RESULTS: Short-term anaesthesia prolonged the simple reaction
time by 7% and the choice reaction times by 25% (one-choice)
and 7% (two-choice) and decreased the speed of movement
by 10% (one-choice) and 19% (two-choice), index finger-tapping
speed by 7% and co-ordination by 7%. In addition, visual
spatial memory capacity decreased by 21%, digit-symbol substitution
increased by 5% and the Maddox Wing test increased by 68%.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, it seems that short-term
anaesthesia reduces both signal processing at the central
level, and motor control and co-ordination of movements
at the peripheral level, and has a decreasing effect on
motor performance in the above-mentioned aspects measured
immediately after wake-up.
PMID: 12094918, UI: 22089350
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002 Jun;19(6):428-35
Effects of induction of anaesthesia with sufentanil and
positive-pressure ventilation on the intra- to extrathoracic
volume distribution.
von Spiegel T, Giannaris S, Schorn B, Scholz M, Wietasch
GJ, Hoeft A
University of Bonn, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive
Care Medicine, Germany. vspiegel@ukb.uni-bonn.de
[Medline record in process]
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Induction of general anaesthesia
in combination with positive-pressure ventilation is often
associated with a significant decrease of arterial pressure.
A decreased preload may contribute to this phenomenon. The
aim was to investigate whether a change in cardiac filling
occurs following the induction of general anaesthesia with
sufentanil under typical clinical conditions. METHODS: Fifteen
patients scheduled for elective coronary bypass grafting
were studied immediately before surgery. In addition to
standard monitors, a transpulmonary double-indicator dilution
technique measured in vivo intrathoracic blood volume, global
end-diastolic volume and total circulating blood volume.
For induction of anaesthesia 2 microg kg(-1) sufentanil
was given. Measurements were performed awake and after the
induction of anaesthesia, intubation and mechanical ventilation
of the lungs. RESULTS: To maintain arterial pressure during
the induction period within -20% of baseline pressure, on
average 22 +/- 6mLkg(-1) crystalloids and 8 +/- 6mLkg(-1)
colloids were given. Despite these amounts of fluid, cardiac
filling was decreased, whereas circulating blood volume
increased significantly. Both central venous pressure and
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased. CONCLUSIONS:
Induction of general anaesthesia with positive-pressure
ventilation is regularly associated with a blood volume
shift from intra- to extrathoracic compartments. Even in
low-dose opioid monoanaesthesia with sufentanil--often regarded
as relatively inert in haemodynamic terms--the phenomenon
could be demonstrated as the primary cause of the often-observed
decrease of arterial pressure. It seems, therefore, rationally
justified to restore cardiac filling by generous administration
of intravenous fluids, at least in patients with unaffected
cardiac pump function. During induction of anaesthesia,
central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
do not reliably indicate cardiac filling.
TUTTO
IL MATERIALE CONTENUTO IN QUESTO SITO E' STATO REPERITO IN RETE. GLI AUTORI
NON SI ASSUMONO RESPONSABILITA' PER
DANNI A TERZI DERIVATI DA USO IMPROPRIO O ILLEGALE DELLE INFORMAZIONI
RIPORTATE O DA ERRORI RELATIVI AL LORO CONTENUTO.