Order this document
Anesth Analg 2002 Aug;95(2):503; discussion 503-4
Publication Types:
PMID: 12145091, UI: 22139678
Other Formats:
Anesth Analg 2002 Aug;95(2):467-71, table of contents
Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute University of Milano, IRCCS H.S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
We compared the effects of a laparoscopic (n = 23) versus laparotomic (n = 21) technique for major abdominal surgery on temperature control in 44 patients undergoing colorectal surgery during a combined epidural/general anesthesia. A thoracic epidural block up to T4 was induced with 6-10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine; general anesthesia was induced with thiopental, fentanyl, and atracurium IV and maintained with isoflurane. Core temperature was measured with a bladder probe and recorded every 15 min after the induction. In both groups, core temperature decreased to 35.2 degrees C (range, 34 degrees C-36 degrees C) at the end of surgery. After surgery, normothermia returned after 75 min (60-120 min) in the Laparoscopy group and 60 min (45-180 min) in the Laparotomy group (P = 0.56). No differences in postanesthesia care unit discharge time were reported between the two groups. The degree of pain during coughing was smaller after laparoscopy than laparotomy from the 24th to the 72nd observation times (P < 0.01). Morphine consumption was 22 mg (2-65 mg) in the Laparotomy group and 5 mg (0-45 mg) in the Laparoscopy group (P = 0.02). The time to first flatus was shorter after laparoscopy (24 h [16-72 h]) than laparotomy (72 h [26-96 h]) (P = 0.0005), and the first intake of clear liquid occurred after 48 h (24-72 h) in the Laparoscopy group and after 96 h (90-96 h) in the Laparotomy group (P = 0.0005). Although laparoscopic surgery provides positive effects on the degree of postoperative pain and recovery of bowel function, the reduction in heat loss produced by minimizing bowel exposure with laparoscopic surgery does not compensate for the anesthesia-related effects on temperature control, and active patient warming must also be used with laparoscopic techniques. IMPLICATIONS: This prospective, randomized, controlled study demonstrates that laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less postoperative pain and earlier recovery of bowel function than conventional laparotomy but does not reduce the risk for perioperative hypothermia. Accordingly, active warming must be provided to patients also during laparoscopic procedures.
PMID: 12145073, UI: 22139660
Anesth Analg 2002 Aug;95(2):461-6, table of contents
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin and VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
We evaluated the cardio-respiratory effects of equi-sedative doses of dexmedetomidine and propofol for intraoperative sedation. Secondary comparison end points were time to achieve and terminate sedation and postoperative analgesia and psychomotor performance. Forty patients scheduled for elective surgery provided informed consent and were randomized equally to receive either dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg initial loading dose for 10 min; maintenance, 0.4-0.7 microg. kg(-1). h(-1)) or propofol (75 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) x 10 min; maintenance, 12.5-75 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)). Hemodynamic variables (heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure), sedation (visual analog scale and Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation), bispectral index score of sedation, ventilation (respiratory rate, O2 sat, and ETCO2), psychomotor performance (digital symbol substitution test), and pain (visual analog scale) were determined during surgery and up to 95 min after surgery. Intraoperative sedation levels were targeted to achieve a bispectral index score of 70-80. Patient demographics, ASA class, surgical procedure, and baseline cardio-respiratory variables were similar between groups. Sedation was achieved more rapidly with propofol but was similar between groups 25 min after initiating infusions. The average infusion rate for dexmedetomidine was 0.7 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) and 38 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) for propofol. There were no differences between groups in psychomotor performance and respiratory rate during recovery. The previous use of dexmedetomidine resulted in more sedation, lower blood pressure, and improved analgesia (less morphine use) in recovery. IMPLICATIONS: Dexmedetomidine may be useful for perioperative sedation. It has a slower onset and offset of sedation compared with propofol. Dexmedetomidine was associated with improved analgesia and less morphine use in the postoperative period.
PMID: 12145072, UI: 22139659
Anesth Analg 2002 Aug;95(2):457-60, table of contents
Department of Anesthesiology, Baystate Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA. scott.reuben@bhs.org
Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using a forearm tourniquet may be a potentially safer technique compared with using an upper arm tourniquet. Ketorolac is a useful adjuvant to lidocaine for IVRA. In this study, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of administering IVRA lidocaine and ketorolac with either a forearm or upper arm tourniquet for outpatient hand surgery. Upper arm IVRA was established using 40 mL of a solution containing 200 mg of lidocaine and ketorolac 20 mg (0.5 mg/mL). Forearm IVRA was established using 20 mL of a solution containing 100 mg of lidocaine and ketorolac 10 mg (0.5 mg/mL). Onset and duration of sensory block as well as postoperative pain and analgesic use were recorded. The patients who received forearm IVRA had a significantly longer period during which they required no analgesics (701 +/- 133 min) compared with 624 +/- 80 min for the upper arm IVRA ketorolac patients (P = 0.032). Onset of sensory block was similar between the two groups; however, recovery of sensation was significantly longer in the Forearm IVRA (22 +/- 5 min) group compared with the Upper Arm IVRA (13 +/- 3 min) group (P < 0.05). There were no differences in postoperative analgesic use or pain scores between the two groups. We conclude that forearm IVRA with lidocaine and ketorolac provides safe and effective perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery. This technique results in a longer duration of sensory block and prolonged postoperative analgesia compared with upper arm IVRA while using one-half the doses of both lidocaine and ketorolac. IMPLICATIONS: Forearm tourniquet intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) with 50% less lidocaine and ketorolac provides for both a longer duration of sensory block and prolonged postoperative analgesia compared with upper arm IVRA.
PMID: 12145071, UI: 22139658
Anesth Analg 2002 Aug;95(2):444-9, table of contents
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Liege, Domaine du Sart-Tilman, Belgium.
Ropivacaine (ROPI), which is less toxic and produces less motor block than bupivacaine (BUPI), seems attractive for epidural analgesia. Few data are available concerning dose requirements of epidural ROPI when combined with morphine. In this study, we compared the dose requirements and side effects of ROPI and BUPI combined with small-dose morphine after major abdominal surgery. Postoperatively, 60 patients were randomly allocated (double-blinded manner) to four groups: patient-controlled epidural analgesia with the same settings using 0.1% or 0.2% solution of ROPI or BUPI combined with an epidural infusion of 0.1 mg/h of morphine. Pain scores, side effects, motor block, and local anesthetic consumption were measured for 60 h. Pain scores and the incidence of side effects did not differ among the groups. Consumption of ROPI and BUPI were similar in both 0.1% groups. Doubling the concentration significantly reduced the consumption (milliliters) of BUPI (P < 0.05) but not of ROPI. Consequently, using ROPI 0.2% significantly increased the dose administered as compared with ROPI 0.1% (ROPI 0.1% = 314 +/- 151 mg and ROPI 0.2% = 573 +/- 304 mg at Hour 48; P < 0.05). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with the 0.1% or 0.2% solution of ROPI or BUPI combined with epidural morphine resulted in comparable analgesia. As compared with ROPI 0.1%, the use of ROPI 0.2% increased consumption of local anesthetic without improving analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: Small-dose (0.1%) ropivacaine and bupivacaine have similar potency and result in comparable analgesia and incidence of side effects.
PMID: 12145069, UI: 22139656
Anesth Analg 2002 Aug;95(2):403-8, table of contents
MGH Pain Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Although epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a common treatment for chronic pain conditions, it is not clear whether there is consensus on their technical aspects. The current literature suggests that variations in technical aspects may affect ESI outcomes. The goal of the survey was to help establish a standard frame of reference for the performance of ESIs. We analyzed survey results from 68 academic anesthesia programs and 28 private practices in the United States. The main finding in this survey is that there is no clear-cut consensus as to the ideal method to perform ESI. There is a wide variation among individual practices in almost every technical aspect of ESI. Private practices use significantly more fluoroscopy than academic centers. The large difference was found in the cervical region where 73% of private practices and only 39% of academic institutions polled perform the ESIs with fluoroscopic guidance (P = 0.005). A similar discrepancy was found in approaches to the epidural space after laminectomy where 61% of private practices, but only 15% of academic centers, use the transforaminal approach. The study results indicate that there is no consensus, and that there is a wide variation in current practices. IMPLICATIONS: A national survey of practices performing epidural steroid injections was conducted. The purpose was to establish whether consensus exists on technical aspects of this procedure. The study results indicate that there is no consensus, and that there is a wide variation in current practices.
PMID: 12145061, UI: 22139648
Br J Anaesth 2002 Jul;89(1):188; discussion 188
[Medline record in process]
PMID: 12173236, UI: 22163579
Br J Anaesth 2002 Jun;88(6):880-1; discussion 881
PMID: 12173217, UI: 22163553
Br J Anaesth 2002 Jun;88(6):814-8
Department of Anaesthetics, PO Box 114-D, Catholic University School of Medicine, Marcoleta 367, Santiago, Chile.
BACKGROUND: Since the time to peak analgesic effect of intravenous morphine can be longer than 40-60 min in volunteers, the goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the timing of intraoperative morphine administration on early postoperative pain. METHODS: A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil and etomidate and maintained with remifentanil and sevoflurane/nitrous oxide. Morphine 150 micrograms kg-1 was given randomly at three different times during surgery, and a fourth group received placebo. Times to eyes opening and extubation were measured, and pain was evaluated in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Morphine 2-3 mg was given when the VAS score was > or = 50 mm. The four groups were, according to the time elapsed from morphine administration to the end of surgery, group 1 (n = 30): placebo; group 2 (n = 33): < 20 min; group 3 (n = 30): 20-40 min; group 4 (n = 27): > 40 min. RESULTS: Recovery from anaesthesia and pain scores were similar in all groups. However, mean (SD) morphine consumption was 5.7 (4.7) mg in group 1, 4.4 (4.2) mg in group 2, 4.7 (4.7) mg in group 3, and 2.2 (4.0) mg in group 4 (P < 0.05, group 1 vs 4). Morphine was required in only 38% of patients in group 4 compared with 83%, 67% and 69% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.01, group 1 vs 4). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of intraoperative morphine administration did not affect the early recovery from anaesthesia. However, the reduction in the number of patients requiring morphine in the PACU when morphine had been given more than 40 min before the end of surgery supports this practice, rather than administration closer to the end of surgery.
PMID: 12173199, UI: 22163535
Br J Anaesth 2002 Jun;88(6):755-7
PMID: 12173188, UI: 22163524
Eur J Pharmacol 2002 Aug 16;450(1):49
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences and Technology, Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, S-141 86, Huddinge, Sweden
We have studied and compared the antinociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic effect of the partial opioid receptor agonist buprenorphine in normal and neuropathic rats. In normal rats, systemic buprenorphine produced dose-dependent antinociception on the hot plate test. In rats with peripheral nerve or spinal cord injury, buprenorphine markedly alleviated neuropathic pain-related behaviors, including mechanical and cold allodynia/hyperalgesia at doses comparable to that producing antinociception. The results suggest that buprenorphine may be a useful analgesic for treating neuropathic pain and thus is an atypical opioid since morphine tends to be less potent after nerve injury.
PMID: 12176108, UI: 22166049
Eur J Pharmacol 2002 Aug 16;450(1):43
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System (VAPAHCS) and Stanford University Department of Anesthesiology, 112A, 3801 Miranda Ave., 94304, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Heme oxygenase catalyzes the formation of CO, Fe(2+) and biliverdin from the substrate heme. In these studies, we attempted to define the roles heme oxygenase play in pain-related behaviors induced by intrathecal injection of the spinal neurotransmitter glutamate. The intrathecal injection of glutamate or the more selective agonists N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) in C57Bl/6 mice lead to caudally directed pain behaviors which were sensitive to the heme oxygenase inhibitors tin protoporphyrin (Sn-protoporphyrin) and chromium mesoporphyrin (Cr-mesoporphyrin). Intrathecal injections of glutamate in heme oxygenase type 2 (HO-2) null-mutant animals resulted in reduced pain-related behaviors when compared with wild type animals. Glutamate, NMDA and AMPA stimulated cGMP accumulation in mouse spinal cord slices, which was blocked by heme oxygenase inhibitors. Glutamate did not stimulate cGMP production in HO-2 null-mutant animals. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that pain-related behaviors induced by spinal glutamate rely on the activation of HO-2 and subsequent production of cGMP.
PMID: 12176107, UI: 22166048
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul;24(1):45
Servei de Cures Palliatives, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
Breakthrough pain (BTP), a transitory exacerbation of pain superimposed on a background of persistent, usually adequately controlled pain, has been reported to occur in 50% to 75% of cancer patients. However, a 23% prevalence of BTP was recently reported in a study of Spanish patients with advanced cancers, showing probably a low detection rate of this clinical problem. The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence of BTP among oncology patients managed by palliative care teams in Catalonia, Spain, and to characterize the frequency, intensity, and treatment of BTP episodes. Sixty-two teams studied 397 patients on a predetermined index day. BTP was reported by 163 (41%) patients, with a total of 244 episodes (mean 1.5 episodes/patient/day). Mean (SD) intensity of BTP episodes was 7.3 (2.0), compared with 2.9 (2.7) for persistent pain (both 0-10 scales). Morphine was used to treat 52% of BTP episodes, while 25% were untreated. These findings indicate that BTP remains underrecognized and undertreated in Spain.
PMID: 12183094, UI: 22170984
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul;24(1):13
Center for Palliative Medicine Malteser Krankenhaus University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
PMID: 12183090, UI: 22170980
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul;24(1):11
British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
PMID: 12183089, UI: 22170979
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul;24(1):4
McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
PMID: 12183086, UI: 22170976
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul;24(1):3
La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy
PMID: 12183085, UI: 22170975
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jul;24(1):1
Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
PMID: 12183084, UI: 22170974
Neurology 2002 Aug 13;59(3):473-4; discussion 474
PMID: 12177397, UI: 22167143
Pain 2002 Apr;96(3):393-402
Department of Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Via de Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy. v.depascalis@caspur.it
This study reports how placebo analgesia was produced by conditioning whereby the intensity of electric stimulation was surreptitiously reduced in order to examine the contribution of psychological factors of suggestibility and expectancy on placebo analgesia. This strategy was used in order to manipulate expectancy for pain reduction. The magnitudes of the placebo effects were estimated after a manipulation procedure and during experimental trials in which stimulus intensities were reset to original baseline levels. Individual differences in suggestibility, verbal expectancy for drug efficacy and manipulation procedure for pain reduction were tested as possible mediators of placebo analgesia. The following dependent variables were measured: (a) subjective expectancy for drug efficacy in pain relief, (b) expected pain intensity and unpleasantness, (c) concurrent pain intensity and unpleasantness and (d) remembered pain intensity and unpleasantness. Statistically significant placebo effects on sensory and affective measures of pain were obtained independently of the extent of the surreptitious lowering of stimulus strength during manipulation trials. The pairing of placebo administration with painful stimulation was sufficient to produce a generalized placebo analgesic effect. However, verbal expectancy for drug efficacy and individual differences in suggestibility were found to contribute significantly to the magnitude of placebo analgesia. The highest placebo effect was shown by the most pronounced reductions in pain ratings in highly suggestible subjects who received suggestions presumed to elicit high expectancy for drug efficacy. The results also demonstrated that placebo effects established on remembered pain were at least twice as great as those obtained on concurrent placebo effects. This was mainly because baseline pain was remembered as being much more intense than it really was. Moreover, remembered placebo effects, like the concurrent placebo effects, were highly correlated with expected pain scores obtained just after manipulation trials. These results indicate that multiple factors contribute to the placebo effect, including suggestibility, expectancy and conditioning, and that the judgement of placebo analgesia is critically determined by whether pain relief is assessed concurrently or after treatment.
PMID: 11973014, UI: 21970151
the above reports in Macintosh PC UNIX Text HTML format documents on this page through Loansome Doc