Anesth Analg 2002 Jun;94(6):1606-13, table of contents
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Lapeyronie University Hospital, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier Cedex, France. x-capdevila@chu-montpellier.fr
A computed tomographic scan was obtained in 35 patients to measure the depth and the relationship of the branches of the lumbar plexus to the posterior superior iliac spine projection and the vertebral column. In addition, we prospectively studied 80 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty who received a continuous psoas compartment block (CPCB) in the postoperative period. CPCB was performed after surgical procedures by using modified Winnie's landmarks and nerve stimulation. From 5 to 8 cm of catheter was inserted. Radiographs were obtained after injection of 10 mL of contrast medium. An initial loading dose (0.4 mL/kg) of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine for 48 h. The depth of the lumbar plexus and the distance between the lumbar plexus and the L4 transverse process were measured. Visual analog scale values of pain at 1, 12, 24, and 48 h were obtained at rest and during mobilization. Amounts of rescue analgesia were also recorded. Sensory blockade of the principal branches of the lumbosacral plexus was noted at 1 and 24 h, as were adverse events related to the technique. There was a significant difference between men and women in depth of the lumbar plexus (median values, 85 vs 70 mm for men and women, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the body mass index and skin-lumbar plexus distances. In contrast, there was no difference regarding the distance between the transverse process of L4 and the lumbar plexus. The catheter tip lay within the psoas major muscle in 74% of the patients and between the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles in 22%. In three patients, the catheter was improperly positioned. At 1 h, sensory blockade of the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves was successful in, respectively, 95%, 90%, and 85% of patients. At 24 h, these rates were 88%, 88%, and 83%, respectively. During the 48-h study period, median visual analog scale values of pain were approximately 10 mm at rest and from 18 to 25 mm during physiotherapy. Five patients received 5 mg of morphine at 1 h. Five cases of unilateral epidural anesthesia were noted after the bolus injection. We conclude that CPCB with 0.2% ropivacaine allows optimal analgesia after hip arthroplasty, with few side effects and a small failure rate. Before lumbar plexus branch stimulation and catheter insertion, anesthesiologists should be aware of the L4 transverse process location and lumbar plexus depth. IMPLICATIONS: Lumbar plexus depth is correlated with the patient's body mass index and differs between men and women, but this is not true of the lumbar plexus-transverse process distance. Considering new landmarks, a continuous psoas compartment block promotes optimal analgesia after hip arthroplasty, with few side effects.
Publication Types:
PMID: 12032037, UI: 22027021
Order this document
Anesth Analg 2002 Jun;94(6):1547-52
Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Central N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors modulate postoperative pain. We compared the effects of preincision oral dextromethorphan (DM), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, on postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine demand and on subjective variables in 80 patients undergoing lower-body procedures who were randomly assigned to epidural lidocaine (LA; 16 mL, 1.6%) or general anesthesia (GA). The patients were premedicated 90 min before surgery with placebo or DM 90 mg (20 patients per group) in a double-blinded manner. Postoperative IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine administration started when subjective pain intensity was > or =4 of 10 (visual analog scale) and lasted 2 h. Observation continued up to 3 days, during which patients could use diclofenac. LA-DM and GA-DM patients required 45%-50% less morphine and diclofenac compared with their placebo counterparts (P < 0.001). However, GA-DM patients made twice as many attempts to self-administer morphine as LA-DM patients (P = 0.005). Eight LA-DM versus two GA-DM patients (P < 0.01) used no morphine or diclofenac. All DM patients experienced significantly (P < 0.001) less pain, were less sedated, and felt better than their placebo counterparts; however, compared with placebo, DM improved subjective scorings in the GA patients more significantly (P < 0.05) than in the LA patients. We conclude that oral DM 90 mg in patients undergoing surgery under LA or GA reduces morphine and diclofenac use by approximately 50% in the immediate and late postoperative period compared with placebo. Subjectively scored levels of pain, sedation, and well-being were better as well.
PMID: 12032024, UI: 22027008
Anesth Analg 2002 Jun;94(6):1484-8, table of contents
University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA. galinkin@email.chop.edu
Pain during venipuncture is a major source of concern to children and their caretakers. Iontophoresis is a novel technique that uses an electrical current to facilitate movement of solute ions (lidocaine) across the stratum corneum barrier to provide dermal analgesia. In this study, we compared dermal analgesia provided by lidocaine iontophoresis and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA). After informed consent, 26 children, aged 7-16 yr, who required venous cannulation on multiple occasions, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, crossover study to receive EMLA and iontophoresis on separate occasions. During a third session, each subject received his or her preferred treatment. Pain during venipuncture was assessed by the subject, parent, observer, and technician performing the procedure, by use of a 100-mm visual analog scale. The observer also used the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale to rate the subject's pain. Ratings of subject satisfaction were also assessed. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the subject-rated visual analog scale or the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores. Eleven (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-69%) of the 22 subjects who completed both sessions preferred iontophoresis. Five subjects (23%; 95% CI, 10%-44%), including two who did not tolerate treatment with iontophoresis, preferred EMLA, and six (27%; 95% CI, 13%-48%) had no preference for the intervention to provide dermal analgesia. We conclude that lidocaine iontophoresis provides similar pain relief for insertion of IV catheters as EMLA and is a useful noninvasive alternative to establish dermal analgesia for venous cannulation. IMPLICATIONS: Iontophoresis is a technique that uses an electrical current to facilitate movement of solute ions (lidocaine) across the stratum corneum barrier to provide dermal analgesia. Lidocaine iontophoresis provides similar pain relief for insertion of IV catheters as eutectic mixture of local anesthetics and is a useful noninvasive alternative to establish dermal analgesia for venous cannulation.
PMID: 12032012, UI: 22026996
Anesth Analg 2002 Jun;94(6):1381-3
PMID: 12031992, UI: 22026976
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002 Mar;19(3):170-2
University of Leicester, Department of Anaesthesia, UK. ps46@le.ac.uk
[Medline record in process]
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pain following the injection of propofol is a common problem. It is often treated by the coadministration of intravenous lidocaine. Iontophoresis, which facilitates the delivery of charged molecules such as lidocaine to body tissues, may be a practical alternative to lessen the pain. METHODS: The iontophoretic application of lidocaine was compared with intravenous lidocaine to assess the relative efficacy of reducing pain during propofol administration. RESULTS: The incidence rate of moderate or severe pain was significantly greater in the iontophoresis group (26.7 compared with 6.9% in the intravenous lidocaine group) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The iontophoretic administration of lidocaine 60 mg does not compare favourably with lidocaine 40 mg mixed with propofol for the reduction of pain on administration of propofol.
PMID: 12071235, UI: 22066143
Geriatrics 2002 May;57(5):64
PMID: 12040596, UI: 22036921
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jun;23(6):537-8
PMID: 12067782, UI: 22063545
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jun;23(6):533-4
PMID: 12067778, UI: 22063541
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jun;23(6):526-32
Oncology Symptom Control & Research, Community Cancer Care, I, ndianapolis, IN, USA
This open-label pilot study explored the antiemetic activity of olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, in patients with advanced cancer requiring opioid analgesics for pain. Fifteen patients received 2 days of a washout and placebo "run-in" followed by two day periods on each of three doses of olanzapine (2.5 mgs, 5 mgs, and 10 mgs). Patients completed a daily food journal as well as the Mini Mental State Exam, Simpson Angus Scale, Barnes Akathisia Scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General across four time periods, with special attention being placed on the nausea item. Eleven women and 4 men with varied primary cancer sites participated. The average age of the sample was 58 years (SD = 16.8). All three dose levels were associated with significant reductions in nausea compared to baseline. Diary entries recorded by the subjects suggested substantial benefits to overall well being and the 5mg condition was associated with statistically significant improvement in overall quality of life over baseline (F = 12.0, p < 0.005). No extrapyramidal symptoms were noted and mental status exams were not changed over the course of the eight days. These results suggest an antiemetic effect for olanzapine and indicate the need for a controlled trial.
PMID: 12067777, UI: 22063540
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jun;23(6):510-6
Medical Statistics Section, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
Pain is the most frequent and disabling complication of herpes zoster. The analysis of pain severity data is complicated by the nonlinear rate of resolution. Further, three distinct phases characterize pain resolution-acute, subacute, and chronic. Using two clinical trial datasets as the bases for analyses, the rates of baseline pain resolution were computed across each of three phases and compared for age, severity of pain at onset, and number of lesions at baseline. The results defined transition points of 24.4 +/- 3.34 for the subacute phase and 110.3 +/- 11.9 days for the chronic phase. The model demonstrated a treatment effect of valiciclovir (VACV) during the subacute phase as compared to acyclovir (ACV) (P = 0.006) and supports effects of age, baseline pain and number lesions on pain cessation rates in the acute phase. This model verifies three phases of zoster pain and delineates the impact of treatment and other factors on the phase-specific rates of pain cessation.
PMID: 12067775, UI: 22063538
J Pain Symptom Manage 2002 Jun;23(6):450-2
Palliative Care Unit, McCulloch House, Monash Medical Center and Southern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Allied Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
PMID: 12067765, UI: 22063528
the above reports in Macintosh PC UNIX Text HTML format documents on this page through Loansome Doc