Anaesth Intensive Care 2001 Dec;29(6):623-6
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Palmerston North Hospital, New Zealand.
[Medline record in process]
A nation-wide evaluation of dopamine usage in New Zealand Intensive Care Units (ICUs) was undertaken. Twenty-six public hospital ICUs participated. Twenty-two ICUs (85%) use dopamine as an inotrope. Seventeen ICUs use dopamine for presumed selective renal effects at least occasionally, but with wide variation in what is considered to be "renal-dose". Level 3 ICUs were less likely to use "renal-dose" dopamine than levels 1 and 2 (P= 0.01). Nineteen units (83%) use weight-referenced (i.e., microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) dopamine administration. Weight-referenced administration and "renal-dose" dopamine were likely to be in use together (P=0.02). Standard dopamine dilutions varied widely with a median of 2 mg x ml(-1) (range 0.4 to 8 mg x ml(-1)). Given a demonstrated association between weight-referenced administration and "renal-dose" dopamine, along with particular pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic reservations, the value of weight-referenced administration of dopamine in adult patients is questioned.
PMID: 11771608, UI: 21627419
Order this document
Anaesth Intensive Care 2001 Dec;29(6):619-22
Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, SA.
Nutritional support is routine practice in critically ill patients and enteral feeding is preferred to the parenteral route. However this direct delivery of nutrients to the gut is potentially ineffective for a variety of reasons. We performed a prospective audit of 40 consecutive intensive care patients to determine whether enteral feeding met the nutritional requirements of our patients. The ideal requirements for each patient were calculated using the Harris-Benedict equation with an adjustment determined by the patient's diagnosis. We compared the amount of feed delivered with the daily requirements over a seven-day period Successful feeding was defined as the achievement of 90% of the ideal calorie requirement for two consecutive days. The mean calculated (+/- SD) energy requirement was 9,566 kJ (+/- 2,586). Patients received only 51% (SD 38) of their energy requirements throughout the study period. Only 10 patients (25%) were successfully fed for at least any two-day period in the seven days. Feeding was limited mainly by gastrointestinal dysfunction or by the need to fast the patient for medical, surgical and airway procedures. Success of feeding was not related to the use of sedative orparalysing agents and had no correlation with plasma albumin concentration. There was no difference in the volume of feed delivered to patients who survived or died. Prokinetic agents were used in 25 patients and in these patients there was a trend towards improved delivery of feed.
PMID: 11771607, UI: 21627418
Anaesthesia 2001 Nov;56(11):1119
Publication Types:
PMID: 11715954, UI: 21571198
Anaesthesia 2001 Nov;56(11):1073-81
Department of Anaesthesia, Stockport NHS Trust, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport SK2 7JE, UK. amccluskey@mcmail.com
We assessed adequacy of ventilation in 20 critically ill patients with multiple organ failure using a Pneupac Ventipac portable ventilator and the effects on patients' haemodynamic stability. Baseline data were recorded over 15 min for a range of respiratory, haemodynamic and oxygen transport variables during ventilation with a standard intensive care ventilator (Engstrom Erica). Patients were then ventilated for 40 min using the portable ventilator. Finally, they were ventilated for a further 40 min using the standard intensive care ventilator. Heart rate, arterial and pulmonary artery pressures were recorded at 5-min intervals throughout the study period. Cardiac index and other haemodynamic data derived from a pulmonary artery catheter were recorded at 20-min intervals. Blood gas analysis was performed and oxygen transport data (oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption and physiological shunt) were calculated at the end of each of the three periods of ventilation. In general, no significant adverse effects of ventilation using the portable ventilator were observed for any of the variables studied. Arterial PO(2) increased significantly during ventilation with the portable ventilator, reflecting the use of a higher inspired oxygen fraction during this part of the study. Oxygen consumption decreased significantly in one patient during ventilation by the portable ventilator although none of the other variables measured in this patient was altered. We conclude that ventilation of critically ill patients using the Pneupac Ventipac portable ventilator was safe, satisfactory and associated with minimal adverse effects on respiratory, haemodynamic and oxygen transport variables.
PMID: 11703240, UI: 21560085
Ann Intern Med 2001 Dec 4;135(11):1008-9
PMID: 11730412, UI: 21587482
Arch Dis Child 2001 Dec;85(6):463-8
Dept of Child Health, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK. anne.greenough@kcl.ac.uk
AIMS: To compare the use of health care resources and associated costs between infants with chronic lung disease (CLD) who had or had not an admission with a proven respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. METHODS: Review of community care, outpatient attendances, and readmissions in the first two years after birth. Patients: 235 infants (median gestational age 27 weeks) evaluated in four groups: 45 infants with a proven RSV admission (RSV proven); 24 with a probable bronchiolitis admission; 60 with other respiratory admissions; and 106 with non-respiratory or no admissions. RESULTS: The RSV proven compared to the other groups required more frequent and longer admissions to general paediatric wards and intensive care units, more outpatient attendances and GP consultations for respiratory related disorders, and had a higher total cost of care. CONCLUSION: RSV hospitalisation in patients with CLD is associated with increased health service utilisation and costs in the first two years after birth.
PMID: 11719328, UI: 21575545
BMJ 2001 Dec 1;323(7324):1276-81
University of Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK. dfield@uhl.trent.nhs.uk
OBJECTIVE: To test two methods of providing low cost information on the later health status of survivors of neonatal intensive care. DESIGN: Cluster randomised comparison. SETTING: Nine hospitals distributed across two UK health regions. Each hospital was randomised to use one of two methods of follow up. Participants: All infants born </=32 weeks' gestation during 1997 in the study hospitals. METHOD: Families were recruited at the time of discharge. In one method of follow up families were asked to complete a questionnaire about their child's health at the age of 2 years (corrected for gestation). In the other method the children's progress was followed by clerks in the local community child health department by using sources of routine information. RESULTS: 236 infants were recruited to each method of follow up. Questionnaires were returned by 214 parents (91%; 95% confidence interval 84% to 97%) and 223 clerks (95%; 86% to 100%). Completed questionnaires were returned by 201 parents (85%; 76% to 94%) and 158 clerks (67%; 43% to 91%). Most parents found the forms easy to complete, but some had trouble understanding the concept of "corrected age" and hence when to return the form. Community clerks often had to rely on information that was out of date and difficult to interpret. CONCLUSION: Neither questionnaires from parents nor routinely collected health data are adequate methods of providing complete follow up data on children who were born preterm and required neonatal intensive care, though both methods show potential.
PMID: 11731389, UI: 21587538
Chest 2001 Nov;120(5):1431-2
PMID: 11713110, UI: 21569886
Clin Infect Dis 2002 Feb 1;34(3):412-6
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. dpegues@mednet.ucla.edu
In October 1998, a patient developed deep surgical-site and organ-space infection with Aspergillus fumigatus 11 days after undergoing liver retransplantation; subsequently, 2 additional patients in the transplant intensive care unit had invasive pulmonary infection with A. fumigatus diagnosed. It was determined that debriding and dressing wounds infected with Aspergillus species may result in aerosolization of spores and airborne person-to-person transmission.
PMID: 11753826, UI: 21634158
Crit Care Clin 2001 Oct;17(4):943-66
Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Illinois, USA. fclark10@hotmail.com
Nociception is a complicated process, and only in recent years have the neural pathways and mediators of pain transmission been unraveled. Several regional anesthetic interventions, most notably epidural drug delivery, can interrupt nociception and provide safe and effective pain control in critically ill patients while substantially reducing the need for systemic medications. This article discusses the possibilities for regional control of the neurobiology of nociception and describes the arsenal of regional anesthetic techniques available to the intensivist. Used wisely, regional techniques can provide excellent pain control and may have a significant role in improving overall patient outcome. Regional analgesia offers the best opportunity to provide substantial analgesia without significant central opioid effects. Well-conducted regional analgesia can reduce many of the unpleasant or potentially problematic side effects observed when traditional intravenous medications are used exclusively for pain control.
PMID: 11762269, UI: 21598604
Crit Care Clin 2001 Oct;17(4):925-42
Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
The use of NMB agents for more than 24 to 48 hours in critically ill patients is associated with many potential complications. Neuromuscular-blocking drugs should be used only when their use is essential for optimal patient care. The indications for neuromuscular blockade must be defined clearly, and patients should be evaluated during treatment for the need for continued muscle relaxation. The smallest doses of NMB agents that will accomplish clinical goals should be used. This dosage can be determined through clinical evaluations and peripheral nerve monitoring. It is essential that all patients treated with NMB drugs receive appropriate sedation and analgesia. Myopathies, neuropathies, and alterations of the neuromuscular junction can occur in the ICU setting, and nondepolarizing muscle relaxants seem to be involved in the development of these disorders. Clinicians should be aware of risk factors that may predispose certain patients to neuromuscular complications, including sepsis and the use of high-dose steroids. Neuromuscular-blocking agents should be avoided in these patients if possible. Although not proved, early recognition and treatment of iatrogenic neuromuscular complications may improve patient outcome.
PMID: 11762268, UI: 21598603
Crit Care Clin 2001 Oct;17(4):881-97
Sir Ivan Magill Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Division of Surgery, Anaesthetics, and Intensive Care, Imperial College School of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom. m.maze@ic.ac.uk
Several advances are likely to benefit the ICU patient requiring sedation, analgesia, and anxiolysis. The cooperative sedation induced by dexmedetomidine is a unique and valuable state that allows patients to be aroused easily and interferes little with ventilation. Remifentanil is the prototype of short-acting drugs, providing fast onset and offset; its relatively high cost may be balanced by limiting the risk for long-lasting respiratory depression. Lorazepam seems to be finding more proponents, especially in long-term ICU sedation where the costs of the newer agents may be prohibitive.
PMID: 11762266, UI: 21598601
Crit Care Clin 2001 Oct;17(4):863-80
Departments of Anesthesiology and of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Sedatives continue to be used on a routine basis in critically ill patients. Although many agents are available and some approach an ideal, none are perfect. Patients require continuous reassessment of their pain and need for sedation. Pathophysiologic abnormalities that cause agitation, confusion, or delirium must be identified and treated before unilateral administration of potent sedative agents that may mask potentially lethal insufficiencies. The routine use of standardized and validated sedation scales and monitors is needed. It is hoped that reliable objective monitors of patients' level of consciousness and comfort will be forthcoming. Each sedative agent discussed in this article seems to have a place in the ICU pharmacologic armamentarium to ensure the safe and comfortable delivery of care. Etomidate is an attractive agent for short-term use to provide the rapid onset and offset of sedation in critically ill patients who are at risk for hemodynamic instability but seem to need sedation or anesthesia to perform a procedure or manipulate the airway. Ketamine administered through intramuscular injection or intravenous infusion provides quick, intense analgesia and anesthesia and allows patients to tolerate limited but painful procedures. The risk/benefit ratio associated with the use of this neuroleptic agent must be weighed carefully. Ketamine is contraindicated in patients who lack normal intracranial compliance or who have significant myocardial ischemia. Barbiturates are reserved mainly to induce coma in patients at risk for severe CNS ischemia, which frequently is associated with refractory intracranial hypertension, or in patients with status epilepticus. When administered in high doses, these drugs have prolonged sedative and depressant effects. Judicious hemodynamic monitoring is required when barbiturate coma is induced. Haloperidol is indicated in the treatment of delirium. Patients should be monitored for extrapyramidal side effects and, when they require higher doses, for potential electrocardiographic prolongation of the QT interval. Dexmedetomidine may evolve into an agent with qualities comparable with midazolam and propofol, and it may even become a drug of choice in select patients. Further study is required, however. Propofol has many of the qualities of an ideal sedative agent. Benzodiazepines and narcotics often are used in concert with propofol to provide reliable amnesia and to relieve pain, respectively. Propofol frequently causes hypotension when administered as a bolus or infusion, particularly in patients with limited cardiac reserve or hypovolemia. More data must be obtained to identify potential deleterious effects of hypertriglyceridemia, and further evaluation of the potential benefits in certain patient populations, such as neurosurgical patients, is needed.
PMID: 11762265, UI: 21598600
Crit Care Clin 2001 Oct;17(4):843-62
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
The effects of BZ drugs result from interaction at the GABAA receptor within the CNS, producing anxiolysis, hypnosis, and amnesia in a dose-dependent fashion. These sedative effects are best titrated to reproducible clinical endpoints, using scoring systems such as the Ramsay scale. All BZs exhibit similar pharmacologic effects, but the important differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics should be recognized to use these drugs safely and effectively within the ICU. Diazepam is the classic anxiolytic, amnestic, and sedative agent, but the presence of long-acting active metabolites that depend on the kidneys for elimination limits its use in many ICU patients. Lorazepam is the most potent BZ used in the ICU; it has stable pharmacokinetics and relatively low cost. This drug is best reserved for situations in which rapid onset is not essential and long-term sedation is anticipated. Midazolam has the shortest t1/2 of the commonly used BZs, generates few active metabolites, and is water soluble at physiologic pH. Thus, it is well suited for continuous infusion in the ICU, and the recent introduction of generic formulations of midazolam has decreased the drug-acquisition cost for many hospitals. Optimal sedation for ICU patients often requires BZ and concomitant therapy with drugs such as haloperidol, dexmedetomidine, opioids, and so forth, to reduce untoward side effects and, perhaps, overall drug costs. Flumazenil, a specific BZ antagonist, can be used for diagnostic or therapeutic reversal of BZ agonists when appropriate. Most experienced intensivists recommend an individualized approach to sedation and titration of anxiolysis to maximize efficacy, minimize side effects, and optimize cost effectiveness in the ICU. New CNS monitors of the EEG, such as the BIS or entropy EEG monitors, may refine titration algorithms further in the near future.
PMID: 11762264, UI: 21598599
Crit Care Clin 2001 Oct;17(4):821-42
Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, USA. Szokol@nwu.edu
Anxiety, agitation, delirium, and pain are common findings in the ICU. These unhealthy states may lead to increased irritability, discomfort, hypertension, tachycardia, cardiac ischemia, harmful motor activity, and psychologic disquiet for the patient. The appropriate treatment of these conditions may lead to decreased morbidity and mortality in the critically ill patient. Unfortunately, the management of anxiety, agitation, delirium, and pain in the intensive care unit is not ideal. Many patients interviewed after an ICU stay rate their pain control as poor and their memories of their stay as unpleasant. Furthermore, many caregivers lack sufficient understanding of the appropriate or indicated uses of drugs to allay patients' fears and pain. The use of suitable protocols for the proper titration of sedation of mechanically ventilated patients and monitoring of the level of sedation in ventilated patients may decrease the amount of time that patients are ventilated and may alleviate some of the emotional stresses of recall of painful procedures or uncomfortable mechanical ventilation. Future research into protocols for the care of the critically ill patient can enhance the overall well-being of these patients.
PMID: 11762263, UI: 21598598
Crit Care Med 2001 Dec;29(12 Suppl):A1-202
PMID: 11775595, UI: 21631389
Crit Care Med 2001 Nov;29(11):2220-2
Departement d'Anesthesie reanimation, Hopital General, CHU Dijon, Dijon Cedex, France.
OBJECTIVE: The causes of hypopituitarism in adult life are most frequently cerebral tumors, pituitary infarction, head trauma, pituitary surgery, or irradiation. We report a case of hypopituitarism after surgical clipping of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Two previous cases after the rupture of a cerebral aneurysm have been reported. DESIGN: Case report. PATIENTS: One 42-yr-old man. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 42-yr-old man was admitted as an emergency for unconsciousness. The computed tomography showed a massive subarachnoid hemorrhage, and specific angiography showed an aneurysm in the internal carotid. The aneurysm was successfully clipped through craniotomy. The patient's hospital course was marked by a few episodes of pulmonary infection, and a tracheotomy was performed. The patient was transferred to the rehabilitation unit; he received a rating of 9 on the Glasgow Coma Scale. Seven months after rupture of the aneurysm, the patient was readmitted to the intensive care unit for septic shock, with pulmonary infection associated with vomiting and diarrhea. Despite standard therapy and inotropic support, there was no improvement of his clinical condition. Adrenal failure was then suspected. Treatment was started immediately with hydrocortisone (50 mg) four times a day. Within hours, his clinical condition improved. The following month, the patient was weaned off his tracheotomy and had nearly recovered. Endocrine tests confirmed the cortisol insufficiency but also hypothyroidism and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism secondary to hypopituitarism. CONCLUSION: Our case is the first one reported of hypopituitarism after surgical clipping of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm.
PMID: 11700429, UI: 21557007
Crit Care Nurse 2001 Dec;Suppl:1-14; quiz 16
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Ill, USA.
PMID: 11767806, UI: 21617905
JAMA 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10
Division of Allergy/Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Center for Health Services Research, 6th Floor Medical Center East 6109, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37323-8300, USA. wes.ely@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
CONTEXT: Delirium is a common problem in the intensive care unit (ICU). Accurate diagnosis is limited by the difficulty of communicating with mechanically ventilated patients and by lack of a validated delirium instrument for use in the ICU. OBJECTIVES: To validate a delirium assessment instrument that uses standardized nonverbal assessments for mechanically ventilated patients and to determine the occurrence rate of delirium in such patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study testing the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU Patients (CAM-ICU) in the adult medical and coronary ICUs of a US university-based medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 111 consecutive patients who were mechanically ventilated were enrolled from February 1, 2000, to July 15, 2000, of whom 96 (86.5%) were evaluable for the development of delirium and 15 (13.5%) were excluded because they remained comatose throughout the investigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence rate of delirium and sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability of delirium assessments using the CAM-ICU, made daily by 2 critical care study nurses, compared with assessments by delirium experts using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria. RESULTS: A total of 471 daily paired evaluations were completed. Compared with the reference standard for diagnosing delirium, 2 study nurses using the CAM-ICU had sensitivities of 100% and 93%, specificities of 98% and 100%, and high interrater reliability (kappa = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.99). Interrater reliability measures across subgroup comparisons showed kappa values of 0.92 for those aged 65 years or older, 0.99 for those with suspected dementia, or 0.94 for those with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores at or above the median value of 23 (all P<.001). Comparing sensitivity and specificity between patient subgroups according to age, suspected dementia, or severity of illness showed no significant differences. The mean (SD) CAM-ICU administration time was 2 (1) minutes. Reference standard diagnoses of delirium, stupor, and coma occurred in 25.2%, 21.3%, and 28.5% of all observations, respectively. Delirium occurred in 80 (83.3%) patients during their ICU stay for a mean (SD) of 2.4 (1.6) days. Delirium was even present in 39.5% of alert or easily aroused patient observations by the reference standard and persisted in 10.4% of patients at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium, a complication not currently monitored in the ICU setting, is extremely common in mechanically ventilated patients. The CAM-ICU appears to be rapid, valid, and reliable for diagnosing delirium in the ICU setting and may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes.
PMID: 11730446, UI: 21588590
Pediatrics 2002 Jan;109(1):E10
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. m.schmugge@freesurf.ch
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a well-known side effect of heparin therapy, occurs in 1% to 5% of adults exposed to heparin. Of those, about 29% to 88% develop thrombosis. Most data on HIT-associated thrombosis in children are confined to anecdotal reports. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of HIT-associated thrombosis in heparin-exposed children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit between August 1996 and January 1999. Patients who received heparin for >/=5 days were eligible. Within these patients, we identified all cases of radiologically confirmed thrombosis. Cases of thrombosis were reviewed for fulfillment of clinical HIT criteria. HIT-associated thrombosis was confirmed serologically by determination of levels of antibodies against heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes. RESULTS: Of 1950 children admitted during the study period, 612 were exposed to heparin for >/=5 days. Thrombosis occurred in 57 patients (9.3%). Plasma samples were available for 38 cases, of which 14 satisfied clinical HIT-criteria. Calculated incidence rate for HIT-associated thrombosis: 2.3%, (95% confidence interval: 1.3%-3.9%, for patients exposed to heparin >/=5 days). Nine patients suffered from venous, 2 patients from arterial, and 3 had combined arterial and venous thrombosis. None of the 14 patients died or underwent amputation. Six patients had heparin and platelet factor 4-complex antibody levels above the cutoff level for adults. The remaining 8 patients had significantly higher antibody levels than a matched control group. CONCLUSION: Compared with that reported for adults, HIT-associated thrombosis in pediatric intensive care unit patients has a similar incidence but a less severe outcome.
PMID: 11773578, UI: 21635864
Respir Care 2002 Jan;47(1):31-8
Respiratory Care Department, Primary Children's Medical Center, 100 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City UT 84113-1100.
INTRODUCTION: Aerosolized albuterol is commonly used in the treatment of neonatal respiratory illnesses. Clinical and in vitro studies have identified numerous factors that affect aerosol drug delivery during neonatal mechanical ventilation, including the choice of metered-dose inhaler (MDI) or nebulizer, the use of a holding chamber, time between actuations, the volume of nebulized solution, and the position and placement of the nebulizer or MDI. Because there is no consensus on the optimal method of administration, there is probably substantial variability among institutions in how aerosolized albuterol is administered to mechanically ventilated infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). OBJECTIVE: Survey academic medical centers in the United States regarding their practices of administering aerosolized albuterol to intubated newborns in the NICU. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed that queried 18 aspects of albuterol administration in mechanically ventilated infants, including the frequency of MDI and nebulizer use, the average and maximum dose, the time between MDI actuations and following the final actuation, the use of a holding chamber, and the placement location of the holding chamber or nebulizer. Respiratory therapists and respiratory therapy managers having direct knowledge of neonatal clinical practices in their neonatal fellowship program NICUs were surveyed via telephone. Those who did not respond via telephone were surveyed via fax. RESULTS: Eighty institutions were surveyed and there were 68 respondents (85% response rate). Responders averaged 35 +/- 13 NICU beds and 11 +/- 5 ventilators/d. Nineteen percent of the respondents reported administering albuterol via MDI 100% of the time; 22% use MDIs 75-99% of the time; 9% use MDIs 50-74% of the time; 4% use MDIs 25-49% of the time; and 43% never use MDIs to deliver albuterol. The average dose via MDI was: 1 puff: 30%; 2 puffs: 65%; and 4 puffs: 5%. The maximum dose via MDI was: 2 puffs: 30%; 3 puffs: 14%; 4 puffs: 36%; 6 puffs: 11%; and 8 puffs: 6%. Thirty-one percent of the respondents place the holding chamber in-line with the ventilator circuit, 56% administer the aerosol via manual ventilation, and 13% use both methods. Fifty-six percent place the in-line holding chamber between the endotracheal tube and ventilator circuit, and the other 44% place the in-line holding chamber in the inspiratory limb. The time between MDI actuations depended on whether the holding chamber was placed in-line or the aerosol was administered via manual ventilation (MV): </= 0.5 min: 18% in-line and 28% MV; 1 min: 47% in-line and 43% MV; 2 min: 6% in-line and 4% MV; 3 min: 6% in-line and 0% MV. Eighty-three percent of respondents indicated that dead space introduced by a holding chamber/spacer was not a concern. Forty-three percent use nebulizers exclusively to administer albuterol to mechanically ventilated patients. Seventy-four percent of centers that nebulize albuterol use a dose of 1.25-2.5 mg. Eighty-eight percent of the surveyed institutions place nebulizers in-line with the ventilator circuit, and the other 12% use manual ventilation to administer the nebulized aerosol. Of those that use in-line nebulization, 95% place the nebulizer in the inspiratory limb of the circuit, and the other 5% place the nebulizer between the endotracheal tube and circuit Y-piece. Among centers that place the nebulizer in the inspiratory limb, 52% place it adjacent to the circuit Y-piece, 36% place it midway upstream in the inspiratory limb, and 12% place it near the humidifier. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variability among NICUs in albuterol administration to mechanically ventilated infants, with the majority of institutions now administering albuterol via MDI.
PMID: 11749685, UI: 21625165
the above reports in Macintosh PC UNIX Text HTML format documents on this page through Loansome Doc